RE: Module Licensing? (thinking a little more)

From: Drizzt Do'Urden (drizzt.dourden@iname.com)
Date: Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:00:45 EST


Yes, clause 3.a) "machine readable source code". A .s file is, "machine
readable source code" by the assembler and by people that have enough time
to lost.. It is like head.S, but using numeric labels and other stuff of
that kind.

Btw I don't understand exactly the problem with the use of asm code (in
opcodes or in nemonics) and the GPL in this particular case . To me, it's
"machine readable source code" by the assembler and if it's compilation
produces exactly the same executable, and don't see the problem.

It's a nighmare to debug and mantain, but it's the problem who made the
"asm" modulo not the kernel people.

Saludos
Drizzt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST