Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel.

From: Remco Post (r.post@sara.nl)
Date: Thu Nov 08 2001 - 05:00:27 EST


> >>Here's my go at a new design for /proc. I designed it from a userland
> >>point of view and tried not to drown myself into details.
> >
> >Did you have to change the subject line. It makes it harder to kill >file
> >when people keep doing that
>
> You really consider this discussion to be unimportant? Granted, the lack of
> organization in /proc is not a bug, but keeping the kernel organized is part
> of maintenence. Like cleaning my room-- it's not a showstopper if it is
> messy, but it is nicer and easier to work in when neat.
>
> Will Knop
> w_knop@hotmail.com

Hi,

the discussion is irrelevant. Despite what everybody thinks, Linus thinks
/proc must be not binary, so it will stay that way for those of us who run
Linus kernels...

I can inmagine people like Alan ignoring this discussion after such a
statement, the outcome of the discussion is irrelevant for the kernel
development.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post

SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdam High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008 Fax. +31 20 668 3167

"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:17 EST