Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Nov 07 2001 - 20:36:49 EST

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
In reply to: Tim Schmielau: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
   Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 02:20:02 +0100 (CET)

   They actually are necessary as unsigned values can never become less than
   zero.

I definitely stand corrected.

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit."
In reply to: Tim Schmielau: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:37 EST