Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel.

From: David Ford (david@blue-labs.org)
Date: Wed Nov 07 2001 - 19:54:21 EST

Next message: Tim Schmielau: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Previous message: Tim Jansen: "/proc discussions"
In reply to: antirez: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Next in thread: antirez: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Reply: antirez: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

That doesn't solve anything if the data value includes ( or ). It just
avoids ' ' in the data value and adds complexity.

-d

antirez wrote:

>((dev/hda1)(/home/mbrennek/stuff and)(vfat)(rw)(0)(0))
>((/dev/hda2)(/var/tmp)(ext2)(rw)(0)(0))
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Schmielau: "Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup"
Previous message: Tim Jansen: "/proc discussions"
In reply to: antirez: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Next in thread: antirez: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Reply: antirez: "Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:37 EST