Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs

From: Andreas Dilger (adilger@turbolabs.com)
Date: Wed Nov 07 2001 - 18:18:47 EST

Next message: Mike Kasick: "Re: EMU10K1 and High Memory conflict in 2.4.13/2.4.14"
Previous message: Phil Howard: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Nov 07, 2001 14:56 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > Does that work for non-root ext3 mounts also? ie, will ext3 default to
> > data=journaled mode for future mounts?
>
> Nope. You specify the option to other filesystems in /etc/fstab.

Maybe it should be possible to specify the journaling mode in the journal
superblock? A mount option would override it, but it would at least set
the default mode.

Cheers, Andreas

-- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Kasick: "Re: EMU10K1 and High Memory conflict in 2.4.13/2.4.14"
Previous message: Phil Howard: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:37 EST