Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 07 2001 - 05:47:16 EST

Next message: George Greer: "keve-ntd (linux 2.2.20 and egcs 1.1.2 sillies, not gcc 3)"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition"
Next in thread: Jan Marek: "Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> We know enough about that hardware to turn the IRQ off from Linux, don't we?
> If it's a common problem, we could make a PCI quirk for it.

Maybe. Wonder what happens if you stick it into D3 power off

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: George Greer: "keve-ntd (linux 2.2.20 and egcs 1.1.2 sillies, not gcc 3)"
Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition"
Next in thread: Jan Marek: "Re: Cannot unlock spinlock... Was: Problem in yenta.c, 2nd edition"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:34 EST