Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc

From: Tim Jansen (tim@tjansen.de)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:06:08 EST

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Memory accounting problem in 2.4.13, 2.4.14pre, and possibly 2.4.14"
Previous message: Mikael Hedin: "Disk corruption with VIA KT266 chipset (update)"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Erik Andersen: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tuesday 06 November 2001 22:24, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I really fail to see your point, it's trivial to make
> files which are easy to read by humans and also very
> easy to parse by shellscripts.
> PROCESSOR=0
> VENDOR_ID=GenuineIntel
> CPU_FAMILY=6
> MODEL=6
> MODEL_NAME="Celeron (Mendocino)"

Wow, this is a good one...

bye..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Memory accounting problem in 2.4.13, 2.4.14pre, and possibly 2.4.14"
Previous message: Mikael Hedin: "Disk corruption with VIA KT266 chipset (update)"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Next in thread: Erik Andersen: "Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:32 EST