Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]

From: Martin Dalecki (dalecki@evision-ventures.com)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 08:49:59 EST


Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Tim Jansen wrote:
>
> > But how can the user know this without looking into the kernel? Compare it to
> > /proc/mounts. Proc mounts escapes spaces and other special characters in
> > strings with an octal encoding (so spaces are replaced by '\040').
>
> Ah, yes - the horrible /proc/mounts. Check that code in 2.4.13-ac8, will
> you?
>
> Yes, current procfs sucks. We got a decent infrastructure that allows
> to write that code easily. Again, see -ac8 and watch fs/namespace.c
> code dealing with /proc/mounts.
>
> No need to play silly buggers with "one value per file" (and invite the
> Elder Ones with applications trying to use getdents()). Sigh...

Getdents() can be removed since 2.0 times. I never noticed *any*
application
actually using it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:29 EST