Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]

• Next message: Chris Abbey: "Re: How can I know the number of current users in the system?"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Scheduling of low-priority background processes"
• In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Next in thread: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 01:54 AM 11/6/01 +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>Lets just not lose sight of the overhead connected with ASCII proc IO, it's a
>lot more than some seem to think.

Any idea what the overhead connected with a binary proc IO would be? From
looking at some of the code, it would appear that you have a lot of
overhead no matter what you do.

Satch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Chris Abbey: "Re: How can I know the number of current users in the system?"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Scheduling of low-priority background processes"
• In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Next in thread: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:28 EST