Re: Scheduling of low-priority background processes

From: Thomas Koeller (tkoeller@gmx.net)
Date: Mon Nov 05 2001 - 18:30:08 EST

Next message: Tim Jansen: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Juri Haberland: "Re: [PATCH] SMM BIOS on Dell i8100"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Scheduling of low-priority background processes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday, 5. November 2001 23:24, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> please read the scheduler; it's not that bad, especially if you
> ignore the SMP case. normal procs are only considered if there
> are no runnable RT procs.

I know the scheduler works this way. But does it have to? What I meant to do
was suggesting an improvement.

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Koeller
tkoeller@gmx.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Jansen: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Juri Haberland: "Re: [PATCH] SMM BIOS on Dell i8100"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: Scheduling of low-priority background processes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:27 EST