> to answer other "not asked" questions of yours ill point you to :
> http://www.specbench.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001127-00075.html
>
> as that should help you very much :) (that /proc tweaking its pretty cool)
Thanks!
Just one thing...
I need redundancy, so I can't go with RAID 0. I thought I'd go with RAID
4, to avoid reading the parity info (and thereby wasting time), and still
have some quite good redundancy.
Q: Should I use hardware RAID or software RAID here? I can see they've
been using a rather large stripe (or chunk) size on the RAID (2MB). The
RAID controller I planned to use only supports up to 512kB stripes. As I
said, the files I'm reading are rather large - up to 10GB each, or at
least 1GB. I'm reading 4-7Mbps (500-900kB) per connection and each
connection reads only one file. Will a large stripe size help me here?
roy
--- Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:26 EST