Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]

From: Tim Jansen (tim@tjansen.de)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2001 - 13:20:39 EST


On Sunday 04 November 2001 18:28, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > It needs special parsers and will be almost impossible to access from
> > shell scripts.
> No, look, he's proposing to put the binary encoding in hidden .files. The
> good old /proc files will continue to appear and operate as they do now.

But as he already said:
2) As /proc files change, parsers must be changed in userspace

So if only some programs use the 'dot-files' and the other still use the
crappy text interface we still have the old problem for scripts, only with a
much larger effort.

bye...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:23 EST