Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]

From: John Levon (moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2001 - 13:02:09 EST

Next message: george anzinger: "Re: Locks in kernel"
Previous message: John Levon: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
In reply to: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Next in thread: Tim Jansen: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 06:48:39PM +0100, Jakob Østergaard wrote:

> Where's the policy ? The only policy I see is the text-mode GUI in the
> existing proc interface

well exactly

> - and that is one place where I actually *like* the
> policy as a user (sysadmin)

"meminfo" versus "cat /proc/meminfo" is not too great a leap in 2.7, when
the back-compat stuff gets dropped.

regards
john

-- 
"All this just amounts to more grist for the mill of the ill."
	- Elizabeth Wurtzel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: george anzinger: "Re: Locks in kernel"
Previous message: John Levon: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
In reply to: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Next in thread: Tim Jansen: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:23 EST