Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers

From: Thomas Langås (tlan@stud.ntnu.no)
Date: Thu Nov 01 2001 - 07:00:44 EST

Next message: Juergen Hasch: "Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: graphical swap comparison of aa and rik vm"
In reply to: Andrey Savochkin: "Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers"
Next in thread: Juergen Hasch: "Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers"
Reply: Juergen Hasch: "Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrey Savochkin:
> It should be Rx_TCO_Packets, not Tx.
> The problem described in Intel's advisory is related to incorrect processing
> of receiving packets.

But if it's this bug that's triggered with NFS-traffic, then the counter
should be increasing with every timeout, right? Not just one time. I get a
lot of timeout and the counter is still just 1.

I'm going out to buy me another NIC and try tests a bit systematically, and
report back with the results afterwards.

-- 
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Juergen Hasch: "Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: graphical swap comparison of aa and rik vm"
In reply to: Andrey Savochkin: "Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers"
Next in thread: Juergen Hasch: "Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers"
Reply: Juergen Hasch: "Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:14 EST