On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Hum. I did a quick test here. cvs checkout of a kernel
> tree with source and dest both on the same platter. Using
> ext2:
>
> 2.4.13: 1:34
> 2.4.14-pre3: 1:28
> 2.4.14-pre5: 1:37
>
> We need more silly bugs.
Well, considering that the silly bug could result in request queue
corruption, I really suspect you'll be happier without it ;)
The io_request_lock wasn't held in a critical place, which would
potentially improve performance, but ...
> I'll poke at it a bit more. One perennial problem which
> we face is that there isn't, IMO, a good set of tests for tracking
> changes in thoughput. All the tools which are readily available
> are good for stress testing and silly corner cases but they
> don't seem to model real-world workloads well.
Agreed.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 21:00:39 EST