Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2

From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 14:31:48 EST

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?]"
Previous message: Pau Aliagas: "Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2"
Next in thread: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello!

> The eepro100 card does not provide such ways

It does of course. Only it is not documented.
Intel's driver does mitigate.

Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?]"
Previous message: Pau Aliagas: "Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2"
Next in thread: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:01:04 EST