Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 13:09:17 EST

> FWIW, I still think that means that the console locking changes are broken
> -
> adding a printk shouldn't panic the kernel. I'll go look at the console
> locking
> changes (*and* fix my disgusting hack ;-) )

I suspect the panic has nothing to do with adding the printk, but merely
that the timing patterns of your disgusting hack have changed

Happy logical analysers 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:01:04 EST