Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10.
From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 12:21:07 EST
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??"
- Previous message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Bug Report. Compiling probs w/ kernel 2.4.9"
- In reply to: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Reply: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Reply: Josh MacDonald: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> Please, explain who exactly obtains an advantage of looping.
> net_rx_action()? Do you see drops in backlog?
> net_tx_action()? It does not look critical.
Then how would you explain the 10% speed difference
Ben and others have seen with gigabit ethernet ?
regards,
Rik
--
IA64: a worthy successor to the i860.
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??"
- Previous message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Bug Report. Compiling probs w/ kernel 2.4.9"
- In reply to: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Reply: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Reply: Josh MacDonald: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:01:03 EST