Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()

From: Vojtech Pavlik (vojtech@suse.cz)
Date: Wed Sep 26 2001 - 15:24:50 EST

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: PROBLEM: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. AND VM: killing process .."
Previous message: Robert Williamson: "Re: DELIVERY FAILURE: 550 5.7.1 Policy analysis reported: This is not accepted relay target rcpt=<kernel@vger.kernel.org>"
In reply to: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 10:20:21PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:

> > generic Athlon is
> >
> > nothing: 11 cycles
> > locked add: 11 cycles
> > cpuid: 64 cycles
>
> Interestingly enough, my TBird 1.1G insist on cpuid being somewhat
> slower:
>
> nothing: 11 cycles
> locked add: 11 cycles
> cpuid: 87 cycles

Oops, this is indeed just a difference in compiler options.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: PROBLEM: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. AND VM: killing process .."
Previous message: Robert Williamson: "Re: DELIVERY FAILURE: 550 5.7.1 Policy analysis reported: This is not accepted relay target rcpt=<kernel@vger.kernel.org>"
In reply to: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:51 EST