Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()

• Next message: Michael Guntsche: "Spurious Interrupt in 2.4.10"
• Previous message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: How to exchange data between Kernel & User Space"
• Maybe in reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
• Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
• Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <20010925.132816.52117370.davem@redhat.com> David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:24:21 -0300 (BRST)
>
> Or were you measuring loads which are mostly read-only ?

> When Kanoj Sarcar was back at SGI testing 32 processor Origin
> MIPS systems, pagecache_lock was at the top.

John Hawkes from SGI had published some AIM7 numbers that showed
pagecache_lock to be a bottleneck above 4 processors. At 32 processors,
half the CPU cycles were spent on waiting for pagecache_lock. The
thread is at -

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lse-tech&m=98459051027582&w=2

Thanks
Dipankar

-- 
Dipankar Sarma  <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Project: http://lse.sourceforge.net
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Michael Guntsche: "Spurious Interrupt in 2.4.10"
• Previous message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: How to exchange data between Kernel & User Space"
• Maybe in reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
• Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
• Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: Locking comment on shrink_caches()"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:40 EST