Re: Linux VM design

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Tue Sep 25 2001 - 04:58:54 EST

Next message: Wolly: "Re: Huge disk performance degradation STILL IN 2.4.10"
Previous message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Linux Kernel 2.2.20-pre10 Initial Impressions"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Linux VM design"
Next in thread: bill davidsen: "Re: Linux VM design"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On September 24, 2001 09:32 pm, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > To tell the truth, I don't really see why the frequency
> > information is all that useful either.
>
> > So the list of reasons why aging is good is looking really short.
>
> Ummmm, that _you_ can't see it doesn't mean suddenly all
> VM research from the last 15 years has been invalidated.

Did you have some more reasons to add to the list?

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Wolly: "Re: Huge disk performance degradation STILL IN 2.4.10"
Previous message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Linux Kernel 2.2.20-pre10 Initial Impressions"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Linux VM design"
Next in thread: bill davidsen: "Re: Linux VM design"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 21:00:29 EST