Re: [patch] zero-bounce block highmem I/O, #13

• Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: Determining maximum partition size on a hard disk"
• Previous message: Christian Borntraeger: "re: VM: Bad swap entry 0044cb00"
• In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: [patch] zero-bounce block highmem I/O, #13"
• Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [patch] zero-bounce block highmem I/O, #13"
• Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: [patch] zero-bounce block highmem I/O, #13"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Jens,

On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Ok found the bug -- SCSI was accidentally using blk_seg_merge_ok
> when it just wanted to test if we were crossing a 4GB physical
> address boundary or not. Doh! Attached incremental patch should fix
> the SCSI performance issue. I'm testing right now...

Yup, performance is back to 2.4.9 level. But I do not see an
improvement.

I will now do a database import.

Greetings
                Christoph

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: Determining maximum partition size on a hard disk"
• Previous message: Christian Borntraeger: "re: VM: Bad swap entry 0044cb00"
• In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: [patch] zero-bounce block highmem I/O, #13"
• Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [patch] zero-bounce block highmem I/O, #13"
• Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: [patch] zero-bounce block highmem I/O, #13"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:28 EST