Re: Linux 2.4.8-ac10

From: Chris Meadors (clubneon@hereintown.net)
Date: Fri Aug 24 2001 - 15:21:13 EST


I hope you don't mind if I post this to l-k so Alan (and everyone), can
see (what a fool I am).

On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Pete Zaitcev wrote:

> Curious. Did you keep the dmesg and ksymoops output?

I didn't, but they probally aren't important at this point. I got
2.4.8-ac10 to boot. I was going to build a kernel that oopsed, so I went
to reverse off the -ac10 patch, but patch asked me to ignore the -R. I
was like, crap, I just build a plain 2.4.8. No wonder it wouldn't boot, I
didn't have ext2 built in.

Sorry for your time, and thanks for making me think this through again.

I'll repeat, 2.4.8-ac10 is cool for me now.

(And I got the college dorms online, that have been distracting me all
week, so I can think straight again. :)

-Chris

-- 
Two penguins were walking on an iceberg.  The first penguin said to the
second, "you look like you are wearing a tuxedo."  The second penguin
said, "I might be..."                         --David Lynch, Twin Peaks

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:13 EST