Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)

From: Jes Sorensen (jes@sunsite.dk)
Date: Fri Aug 24 2001 - 07:59:37 EST


>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> writes:

Tom> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:18:02AM +0400, Samium Gromoff wrote:
>> but imagine the X arch hacker does not like python, and
>> nevertheless needs to port it on arch X. still fun?

Tom> Well I know python is endian-clean. I'd suspect it's even
Tom> 32/64bit clean. So it's not a matter of 'port' but compile. And
Tom> Linus has done things which have made lots of kernel hackers
Tom> scratch their head for a while. (Jump out of this fire and into
Tom> the min/max macros in 2.4.9 fire to see what I mean).

Again, please try and do real porting work before you make such silly
statements. Perl is 32/64 little/big-endian clean ... and still it's
the absolutely worst app to bring up (even X tends to be easier).

There is a lot more to this than meets the eye!

Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:08 EST