Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: 19 Aug 2001 14:49:23 -0600
>
> "Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com> writes:
>
> > The Red Hat installation manual claims that the size of the
> > swap partition should be twice the size of physical memory,
> > but no more than 128MB.
> >
> > Should I believe the above formula?
>
> You give two statements. The 128 MB bound was claimed by Microsoft
> and we screamed loudly that that was a lie - now it is claimed
> by both SuSE and RedHat. Funny.
> No, the bound is not 128 MB. See mkswap(8).
I think that red hat means:
recoomended swap (machine) = min (128M, 2 * RAM(machine));
My personal recommendation is:
recoomended swap (machine) = 2 * RAM(machine);
(unless you know what you're doing).
I run three machines with 0Mb swap: I know what I'm doing. If you know
you're going to run VERY VERY large simulations which have sort of
linear memory access patterns, it may pay to have LOTS more swap than
normally recommended.
Also, You spend just a few percent on "recommended swap" in relation
to what you just spent on "RAM (machine)". So even if you're never
going to use it, it's still usefull.
Roger.
-- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. * There are also old, bald pilots. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:08 EST