ll_rw_blk.c changes from 2.4.8 not in -ac

From: Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2001 - 09:50:29 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: ll_rw_blk.c changes from 2.4.8 not in -ac"
Previous message: Zdenek Kabelac: "Spinlock for accessing graphical hardware (G400)"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: ll_rw_blk.c changes from 2.4.8 not in -ac"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: ll_rw_blk.c changes from 2.4.8 not in -ac"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan/Jens,

Why 2.4.8-ac does not contain 2.4.8's ll_rw_blk.c changes ? (the ones
which remove the "queued_sectors" logic)

Those changes improve IO latency a lot.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: ll_rw_blk.c changes from 2.4.8 not in -ac"
Previous message: Zdenek Kabelac: "Spinlock for accessing graphical hardware (G400)"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: ll_rw_blk.c changes from 2.4.8 not in -ac"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: ll_rw_blk.c changes from 2.4.8 not in -ac"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:59 EST