RE: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)

From: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1) (erik_habbinga@hp.com)
Date: Tue Aug 14 2001 - 10:04:51 EST

Chris,
   Which patch is the transaction packing patch? My build did have
"knfsd-6.g" patch, which does the reiesrfs generation number stuff
(attached).

Erik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Mason [mailto:mason@suse.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:25 AM
> To: HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1); 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'
> Subject: re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results
> sho w this)
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 13, 2001 09:40:59 AM -0700 "HABBINGA,ERIK
> (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@hp.com> wrote:
>
> > Here are some SPEC SFS NFS testing
> (http://www.spec.org/osg/sfs97) results
> > I've been doing over the past few weeks that shows NFS performance
> > degrading since the 2.4.5pre1 kernel. I've kept the
> hardware constant,
> > only changing the kernel.
>
> Did the 2.4.5pre1 have the transaction tracking patch?
>
> -chris
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:54 EST