> > >> so it seems to me like kernel problem...
> > >
> > >why is that? I've never seen a sig11 from production >code
> > >that wasn't caused by flakey ram. in fact, your >descriptions
> > >are a perfect example of similar hardware problems.
> >
> Synthetic tests are never as good as a real good gcc run, I'd *never*
> trust them over the indications given by attempting to compile the kernel
> or something big like XFree86.
I agree. I had my computer mildy overclocked for a little while. Everything
ran just great, I could compile kernels, quake3 timedemo for two days, etc.
All was well until I tried to compile gcc itself and I kept getting random
errors. I finally opened up the case and bumped it back down, and like magic
it compiled just fine.
So my advice would be to don't overclock.
Josh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:48 EST