Re: Low-Cost IP TOS bit won't clear.

• Next message: Info: "In addition to: Tulip on 2.4.7 stay unworkable both on 21041 and 21142 in 10M net + OOPS"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: struct page to 36 (or 64) bit bus address?"
• In reply to: Ben Greear: "Low-Cost IP TOS bit won't clear."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
   Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 22:25:51 -0700

   I'm doing some experimenting with setting the various values of
   the IP TOS byte. First (as I already mentioned on the linux-net
   mailing list) the IPTOS_* values in netinet/ip.h do not seem
   correct, they should be shifted left by 2 bits each, if I understand
   correctly...

You do not understand the bit layout correctly :-), and also see what
I mentioned about ECN if you are getting "stuck bits".

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Info: "In addition to: Tulip on 2.4.7 stay unworkable both on 21041 and 21142 in 10M net + OOPS"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: struct page to 36 (or 64) bit bus address?"
• In reply to: Ben Greear: "Low-Cost IP TOS bit won't clear."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:46 EST