Re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8

From: jlnance@intrex.net
Date: Mon Aug 13 2001 - 07:20:41 EST


On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 12:52:47PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Here, disk write throughput seems to want some tweaking, and Bonnie
> > doing it's rewrite test triggers a very large and persistant inactive
> > shortage which shouldn't be there (imho).
>
> This is one of the reasons I kept the 2.4.7 vm. The 2.4.8 vm is better
> than 2.4.8pre but not actually better than the older VM by feel or
> measurement on my test boxes

Alan,
    Which kernels are you refering to when you speak of the older VM?

Thanks,

Jim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:46 EST