Gameport & esssolo1 2.4.8

From: John Levon (moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk)
Date: Sun Aug 12 2001 - 06:48:40 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: struct page to 36 (or 64) bit bus address?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: Gameport & esssolo1 2.4.8"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: Gameport & esssolo1 2.4.8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

esssolo1 uses register_gameport_port() which requires support for it to
be enabled. Shouldn't there be always-failing register/unregister so I don't have
to compile in input support and joystick support ?

thanks
john

-- 
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot
of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
	- Douglas Adams
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: struct page to 36 (or 64) bit bus address?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: Gameport & esssolo1 2.4.8"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: Gameport & esssolo1 2.4.8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:41 EST