Re: VM nuisance

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2001 - 23:46:18 EST

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: re-export nfs possible?"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: VM nuisance"
In reply to: David Ford: "Re: VM nuisance"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: VM nuisance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 11 Aug 2001, David Ford wrote:

> Perhaps a tunable load value w/ kswapd? If you're trying to accomplish
> more than N iterations of kswapd's particular function...take your pick,

David, safemode,

your patches are appreciated. OOM is usually quite a rare
condition so I won't be participating in any handwaving
discussions.

I'm willing to discuss tested patches any time, however.

regards,

Rik

-- IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: re-export nfs possible?"
Previous message: David Ford: "Re: VM nuisance"
In reply to: David Ford: "Re: VM nuisance"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: VM nuisance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:37 EST