Re: [ANNOUNCE] Vendor kernels unpakced

From: Oliver Neukum (Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2001 - 15:46:55 EST


Am Freitag, 10. August 2001 21:29 schrieb Phil Kos:
> > Just as it makes no sense to run a not-up-to-date release
> > kernel, it makes
> > no sense to keep anything but the very last on line. Just MVHO.
>
> I beg to differ, Herr Doktor von Brand. It makes more sense to run a
> not-up-to-date release kernel than it does to slavishly update to every new
> release without any pressing need for new features or functionality. Don't
> fall into the commercial software trap of "it's newer, so it *must* be
> better!"--here be tygers...

The problem is not what people should be running. The kernels people are
actually running are relevant. Any kernel on a CD sold in the last ~3 years
is run and bug reports will arrive.
If you choose to ignore anything but the latest standard kernels you loose a
large number of testers and bugs will go unnoticed longer.

        Regards
                Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:35 EST