On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The following would seem to be required to protect against
> > the case in which PnP BIOS reports an IRQ of 0 for a
> > parport with disabled IRQ. // Thomas jdthood_AT_yahoo.co.uk
>
> IRQ 0 is a legal valid IRQ. I suspect the problem is that pnpbios shouldnt
> be reporting an IRQ or we should be using some kind of NO_IRQ cookie
IRQ0 will never by reported by a PCI bus device because it means that
no IRQ is used (they figured that IRQ0 would always be used for something
else). Maybe PnP BIOS also presumes this? If so, the use of IRQ0 to
mean "no IRQ" is valid, although misleading.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.1 on an i686 machine (799.53 BogoMips).
I was going to compile a list of innovations that could be
attributed to Microsoft. Once I realized that Ctrl-Alt-Del
was handled in the BIOS, I found that there aren't any.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 15 2001 - 21:00:17 EST