Re: /proc/<n>/maps growing...

From: Chris Wedgwood (cw@f00f.org)
Date: Mon Aug 06 2001 - 07:26:50 EST


On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:57:05PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    The point here is not if it's simple or difficult. The point is what can
    be done or not and what is faster or slower. All I'm saying is that I
    don't see why it's not possible to implement the merge_segments with
    only an O(1) additional cost of a few cycles per mmap syscall, which
    will render the feature an obvious improvement (instead of being a
    dubious improvement like in 2.2 that is walking the tree two times).

mmap does merge in many common cases.

  --cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 07 2001 - 21:00:38 EST