Re: Ongoing 2.4 VM suckage

From: Helge Hafting (helgehaf@idb.hist.no)
Date: Mon Aug 06 2001 - 03:55:15 EST


Stephen Satchell wrote:

> While the idea halts other programs trying to allocate memory, it would
> provide cycles to programs that want to RELEASE memory (such as consuming
> data in network buffers) and thus reduce the kswapd thumb-twiddling time.

Processes that want to use much memory on a heavily swapping machine
get delayed already - they have to wait for the swapping. This leaves
the cpu free to do other things, such as running those nice programs
that use little memory or even frees up some.

Helge Hafting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 07 2001 - 21:00:37 EST