On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 08:11:12PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2001, Stephen Tweedie wrote:
>
> > > We don't need all the paths, and not any specific path, just a path.
> >
> > Exactly, because fsync makes absolutely no gaurantees about the
> > namespace. So a lost+found path is quite sufficient.
>
> MTA authors don't share this. lost+found is "invisible" for the
> application that created the file.
>
> I have yet to meet a distribution which scans lost+found at boot time
> and syslogs found files or sends root a mail.
Debian Woody ...
>
> So, effectively, lost+found will NOT be sufficient. Discarding file
> names at will is not a good thing.
>
> --
> Matthias Andree
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Zilvinas Valinskas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 07 2001 - 21:00:36 EST