Hello guys!
I 've been using ext3 and reiserfs for somedays with
2.4.7. Using mkreiserfs I recieved some null pointer
problems and recieved a kernel oops.
While ext3 is mounted as fast as ext2, reiserfs
seems is slower.
ext3, 10 GB: ~ 0.5 seconds
reisferfs 10 GB: ~ 3-5 seconds
Generating the journal with tune2fs was
again much faster than mkreiserfs. But I think
this is because reiser creates a new fs, wherefore
mkfs.ext2 did that before.
While running there occured some problems
with reiserfs.
I am wondering that reiserfs first got into the kernel
before ext3!
Nico
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 07 2001 - 21:00:34 EST