Re: Binding thread to a processor

From: Steven Walter (srwalter@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jul 22 2001 - 12:33:59 EST

Next message: Andrew Friedley: "pppoe patch in 2.4.7 results - still problem"
Previous message: Steven Lass: "Re: 2.4.[<=6] kernel has Cyrix 'coma' bug?"
In reply to: jneeraj@in.ibm.com: "Binding thread to a processor"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 04:52:37PM +0530, jneeraj@in.ibm.com wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am using Suse-linux-7.1 with default linux -ppc kernel on apple G4
> machine.
>
> I have a multithreaded user application and I need to run it on an
> 2.4.2-SMP machine. Do I need bind the thread to a particular processor? If
> yes, how do I do that?
>
> ---
> Neeraj Jain

You shouldn't need to take any special action to get the threads to run
on seperate processes, if that's what you're asking.

If you want the threads to only run on a specific processor each, I'm
afraid that is functionality that isn't availible in the default linux
kernel.

-- 
-Steven
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
			-- George Orwell
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Friedley: "pppoe patch in 2.4.7 results - still problem"
Previous message: Steven Lass: "Re: 2.4.[<=6] kernel has Cyrix 'coma' bug?"
In reply to: jneeraj@in.ibm.com: "Binding thread to a processor"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 23 2001 - 21:00:15 EST