You write:
> I'm sure this has been given thought, so I want to probe teh collective
> resources. We need to have users in more than 32 groups. In fact, they
> may need to be a member of MANY more groups than that.
>
> What is the current thinking on this problem? Would it be desirable to
> replace current->groups[NGROUPS] with a poibnter to an array? Thus
> allowing (with libc changes) many more groups?
The real solution is ACLs (if you are talking filesystem permissions).
See acl.bestbits.at, I think, for ext2 ACL/EA patch.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 23 2001 - 21:00:08 EST