Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}

From: Jussi Laako (jlaako@pp.htv.fi)
Date: Mon Jul 16 2001 - 12:19:23 EST

Next message: Gav: "Linux-2.4.6-ac5 + via/ES1371"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.4.7-pre6 can't complete e2fsck"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}"
Reply: Hans Reiser: "Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}"
Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> We are not that far away from being able to handle 8K blocks, so that
> would bump it up to 32 TB.

That's way too small. Something like 32 PB would be better... ;)
We need at least one extra bit in volume/file size every year.

- Jussi Laako

-- 
PGP key fingerprint: 161D 6FED 6A92 39E2 EB5B  39DD A4DE 63EB C216 1E4B
Available at PGP keyservers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gav: "Linux-2.4.6-ac5 + via/ES1371"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.4.7-pre6 can't complete e2fsck"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}"
Reply: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}"
Reply: Hans Reiser: "Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}"
Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 23 2001 - 21:00:07 EST