[PATCH] hgafb.c as module (unresolved symbol) 2.4.6+

From: Krzysztof Rusocki (kszysiu@braxis.co.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 06 2001 - 05:25:20 EST

Next message: Daniel A. Nobuto: "natsemi.c failure in 2.4.6"
Previous message: Steffen Persvold: "Re: DMA memory limitation?"
Next in thread: Bakonyi Ferenc: "Re: [PATCH] hgafb.c as module (unresolved symbol) 2.4.6+"
Reply: Bakonyi Ferenc: "Re: [PATCH] hgafb.c as module (unresolved symbol) 2.4.6+"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

As far as i noticed - since 2.4.6
there should be defined

#define INCLUDE_LINUX_LOGO_DATA

instead of

#define INCLUDE_LINUX_LOGOBW

otherwise linux logos do not get included and unresolved symbol occures

patch against 2.4.7-pre{1,2,3} attached, which afaik also applies for 2.4.6

PS.
in any case - please CC - not subscribed

text/plain attachment: hgafb.c.diff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel A. Nobuto: "natsemi.c failure in 2.4.6"
Previous message: Steffen Persvold: "Re: DMA memory limitation?"
Next in thread: Bakonyi Ferenc: "Re: [PATCH] hgafb.c as module (unresolved symbol) 2.4.6+"
Reply: Bakonyi Ferenc: "Re: [PATCH] hgafb.c as module (unresolved symbol) 2.4.6+"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 07 2001 - 21:00:17 EST