Re: RFC: modules and 2.5

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Tue Jul 03 2001 - 02:24:26 EST

Next message: Anil Kumar: "RE: Validation of memory allocated through kmalloc"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: virt_to_bus and virt_to_phys on Apple G4 target"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: RFC: modules and 2.5"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: RFC: modules and 2.5"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: RFC: modules and 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2001 07:50:50 +0100,
> Sean Hunter <sean@dev.sportingbet.com> wrote:
> >Does this defeat my favourite module-related gothcha, that the machine panics
> >if I have (say) a scsi driver builtin to the kernel and the same driver tries
> >to load itself as a module?
>
> No, but other wip for 2.5 will.

If this occurs in 2.4 it is a bug and should be fixed in 2.4.

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | "I respect faith, but doubt is
Building 1024    |  what gives you an education."
MandrakeSoft     |           -- Wilson Mizner
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Anil Kumar: "RE: Validation of memory allocated through kmalloc"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: virt_to_bus and virt_to_phys on Apple G4 target"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Re: RFC: modules and 2.5"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: RFC: modules and 2.5"
Reply: Keith Owens: "Re: RFC: modules and 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 07 2001 - 21:00:11 EST