Bogdan Costescu wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, jamal wrote:
>
> > Still, the tx watchdogs are a good source of fault detection in the case
> > of non-availabilty of MII detection and even with the presence of MII.
>
> Agreed. But my question was a bit different: is there any legit situation
> where Tx timeouts can happen in a row _without_ having a link loss ? In
> this situation, we'd have false positives...
yes
--
Jeff Garzik | Echelon words of the day, from The Register:
Building 1024 | FRU Lebed HALO Spetznaz Al Amn al-Askari Glock 26
MandrakeSoft | Steak Knife Kill the President anarchy echelon
| nuclear assassinate Roswell Waco World Trade Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 07 2001 - 21:00:30 EST