Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Mon May 07 2001 - 12:27:35 EST

Next message: Pavel Roskin: "Re: [patch] 2.4 add suffix for uname -r"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
Next in thread: Brian Gerst: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

torvalds@transmeta.com said:
> If anybody has such a beast, please try this kernel patch _and_
> running the F0 0F bug-producing program (search for it on the 'net -
> it must be out there somewhere) to verify that the code still
> correctly handles that case.

Something along the lines of:

echo "unsigned long main=0xf00fc7c8;" > f00fbug.c ; make f00fbug

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Roskin: "Re: [patch] 2.4 add suffix for uname -r"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
Next in thread: Brian Gerst: "Re: [PATCH] x86 page fault handler not interrupt safe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:25 EST