Re: Possible PCI subsystem bug in 2.4

From: Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com)
Date: Sat May 05 2001 - 00:41:39 EST


Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

> > Seriously. With the general attitude of distrusting BIOS's I have
> > been amazed at the number of things linux expects the BIOS to get
> > right. In practice windows seem to trust the BIOS much less than
> > linux does.
>
> It becomes more and more obvious over time exactly why. One problem however
> is that windows gets away with this because many vendors ship random extra
> gunge for their box with the system. We dont yet have that power

Right. So we always need to keep heuristics in our toolbox to fallback on,
so we can run on boards with incomplete information. However there is a lot
of things we can do that we aren't currently doing.

The example that sticks out in my head is we rely on the MP table to
tell us if the local apic is in pic_mode or in virtual wire mode.
When all we really have to do is ask it.

Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 21:00:21 EST