Gregory Maxwell writes:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> [snip]
> > The point is: The code in that "magic page" that considers the
> > tradeoff is KERNEL code, which is designed to care about such
> > trade-offs for that machine. Glibc never knows this stuff and
> > shouldn't, because it is already bloated.
> >
> > We get the full win here, for our "compile the kernel for THIS
> > machine to get maximum performance"-strategy.
> >
> > People tend to compile the kernel, but not the glibc.
> >
> > Just let the benchmarks, Linus and Ulrich decide ;-)
>
> The kernel can even customize the page at runtime if it needs to, such as
> changing algorithims to deal with lock contention.
>
> Of course, this page will need to present a stable interface to
> glibc, and having both the code and a comprehensive jump-table might
> become tough in a single page...
Sure. IIRC, Linus talked about "a few pages".
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:23 EST