Re: Can't compile 2.4.3 with agcc

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Tue Apr 24 2001 - 08:30:09 EST


vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl said:
> These "broken and cryptic" checks have been done several times now.
> You could certainly add a note to this effect to the documentation on
> building the kernel.

> Building a known broken kernel just for the sake of "better error
> reporting" is dead wrong, IMO.

The fact that the error is reported in a cryptic fashion is a minor issue.
The important point is that the check itself is broken and not guaranteed
to work even with good compilers.

--
dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:11 EST