Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12

• Next message: Manuel McLure: "Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
• Maybe in reply to: Alan Cox: "Linux 2.4.3-ac12"
• Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12"
• Reply: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> My belief however is that several million people have gcc 2.96-69+, about 50
> are likely to have random cvs snapshots and none of them are going to build
> kernels with them anyway, as they wont work __builtin_expect or otherwise.
>
> Alan

I will not add fuel to the fire, but isn't 2.4.XX the "stable" version?
And I think most people (here in Europe :-) are running 2.95.2 at the moment.
But, yes the previously patches fixed it.

Thanks,
        Dieter

-- 
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science
University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
Cognitive Systems Group
Vogt-Kölln-Straße 30
D-22527 Hamburg, Germany
email: nuetzel@kogs.informatik.uni-hamburg.de
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Manuel McLure: "Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
• Maybe in reply to: Alan Cox: "Linux 2.4.3-ac12"
• Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12"
• Reply: J . A . Magallon: "Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:43 EST