Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system

From: Francois Romieu (romieu@cogenit.fr)
Date: Sat Apr 21 2001 - 12:04:31 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: x86 rwsem in 2.4.4pre[234] are still buggy [was Re: rwsem benchmarks [Re: generic rwsem [Re: Alpha "process table hang"]]]"
Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Bug report: tcp staled when send-q != 0, timers == 0."
In reply to: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Henning P. Schmiedehausen <mailgate@mail.hometree.net> ecrit :
[...]
> What's wrong with:
>
[xml]

I'd rather use c/etags.

Seriously, it won't create maintainers automagically.
I don't see the benefit.

-- 
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: x86 rwsem in 2.4.4pre[234] are still buggy [was Re: rwsem benchmarks [Re: generic rwsem [Re: Alpha "process table hang"]]]"
Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: Bug report: tcp staled when send-q != 0, timers == 0."
In reply to: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:40 EST